You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32079: test: Add test coverage for rpcwhitelistdefault when unset
2929da1 test: Add coverage for rpcwhitelistdefault when unset (naiyoma)
535b874 test: Combine rpcwhitelistdefault functions (naiyoma)
2b6ce92 test: Update permissions and string formatting (naiyoma)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to address review feedback from [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29858](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29858)
- [x] add case where rpcwhitelistdefault setting is [unset](bitcoin/bitcoin#29858 (review))
- [x] Code [cleanup](bitcoin/bitcoin#29858 (comment)) , change password and f-string formatting
- [x] [Combine](bitcoin/bitcoin#29858 (comment)) rpcwhitelistdefault tests into `test_rpcwhitelistdefault_permissions`
I am not sure if my approach of adding` test_rpcwhitelistdefault_unset` is better or if I should just include the assertions in the existing `test_rpcwhitelistdefault_permissions`
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
Code review ACK bitcoin/bitcoin@2929da1
achow101:
ACK 2929da1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 2929da1. Only change since last review was simplifying the last commit as suggested
Tree-SHA512: 6750dd3e6abaca3a09ad1fd5d07c64767bc59188ff953cbc26aa7796071774cb92745ac82cf91e479632d682fd450bc00d53032454b65b22654a3e770ec68e89
0 commit comments