You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been having issues with training GPVAREstimator using GPU, so I had been testing it with a very small test case, and even then it takes multiple minutes to evaluate the model and to do the back-propagation, on either CPU or GPU.
I have been testing this using the solar-nips dataset, restricted to only 10 time-series, and the following parameters for GPVAREstimator:
So my question is whether it is normal that GPVAREstimator is slow even with that few layers and cells, or if there is a possibility that I have done something wrong elsewhere in my environment.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been having issues with training GPVAREstimator using GPU, so I had been testing it with a very small test case, and even then it takes multiple minutes to evaluate the model and to do the back-propagation, on either CPU or GPU.
I have been testing this using the
solar-nips
dataset, restricted to only 10 time-series, and the following parameters for GPVAREstimator:So my question is whether it is normal that GPVAREstimator is slow even with that few layers and cells, or if there is a possibility that I have done something wrong elsewhere in my environment.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions