[Bug] `summarize_results_all_tasks_all_devs` only returns results for first seed found.

[eddiebergman]

Not really sure how the whole task and dev id's really work but from what I gather from this function the path goes something like this:

• If sub_dir: workingdir/seed/sub_dir/task_id/dev_id.
• Else: workingdir/seed/task_id/dev_id

However this function only takes it over the first valid seed dir found, with no knowledge of what this is.

neps/neps/utils/data_loading.py

Lines 223 to 251 in dbc3076

	def summarize_results_all_tasks_all_devs(
	path, sub_dir="", file_name="summary", user_prior_dir=None
	):
	"""
	Summarizes the results of all tasks and all development stages. This includes runs over
	multiple seeds. The results are saved in the working directory.
	:return: None
	"""
	# go into the first seed directory and read the tasks and dev stages
	seed_iter = os.scandir(path)
	results = None
	for seed_dir in seed_iter:
	seed_dir_path = seed_dir.path
	if not is_valid_seed_path(seed_dir_path):
	continue
	seed_dir_path = os.path.join(seed_dir_path, sub_dir)
	results = read_tasks_and_dev_stages_from_disk([seed_dir_path])
	break
	summary = {}
	# iterate over all tasks and dev stages
	for task_id, task in results.items():
	for dev_id, _ in task.items():
	summary[(task_id, dev_id)] = summarize_results(
	path,
	final_task_id=task_id,
	final_dev_id=dev_id,
	sub_dir=sub_dir,
	write_to_file=False,
	)

---

I guess the way to go (if seed dir is still relevant) is to specifically ask for what seed is requested in the function params.

[eddiebergman]

As an additional thing to fix, this function calls read_tasks_and_dev_stages_from_disk which essentially reads all results from disk, uses just the ids it retrieves and the proceeds to call anther function summarize_results which will then load all results again.

[eddiebergman]

Last point, nothing in NePS is using this function and there's no publicised user API for this. I guess we'll need to rediscover the point of this feature since it's pretty undocumented anywhere.

My guess it's some sort of convinience feature but I don't feel this provides much benefit and perhaps more confusion than if someone just made a different working_directory

[eddiebergman]

More issues with this function, pretty sure this would just not work if subdir was given.

neps/neps/utils/data_loading.py

Line 242 in c48417a

os.path.join(sub_dir, user_prior_dir)

[eddiebergman]

What even is a user prior dir... what's meant to be in there that's different from any other run directory?

neps/neps/utils/data_loading.py

Line 240 in c48417a

if user_prior_dir is not None:

[Meganton]

The code and the entire file containing it don't exist anymore.