Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
How would you go about doing that? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I always think of this as a negative weight with weighted pull-ups. Does this make sense to others? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think the ability to handle progression by decrementing the weight is good, but how does that factor into 1RM calculations for those exercises. Not that it really applies, but being able to track the eRM where the goal is to decrease the weight doesn't really fit from what I've been seeing. Sidenote: Love this app, found it this week and can't help but tell everyone I talk to about it because it's absolutely the best out there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’m not using those personally, but there was some request about that and since we are collecting ideas anyway.
Assisted pull-ups / chin-ups and possibly other exercise are using a counter lever to assist people doing those bodyweight exercises with less than their bodyweight.
Contrary to other machines, the more weight you put, the easier the exercise become. So the progression should be negative, i.e., starting from the user set weight and removing weight as the user progresses.
It’s easy to program in Liftoscript but for new users, Liftosaur does not currently support native negative progression.
It could also be nicely used together with the planned
bodyweight
variable (#122 (comment))Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions