Skip to content

Questions: Why half of pairwise is not a exact mirror of the other half? And about negative values.. #35

@Rseq

Description

@Rseq

Good morning,

Many thanks for developing this amazing tool.
I have a doubt about the pairwise mode that may seem naive, but I could not figure out.
I notice in some of my dataset and also here in this example:

intervene pairwise -i ~/dbSUPER/mm9/*.bed --filenames --compute frac --htype color
https://intervene.readthedocs.io/en/latest/_images/pairwise_color.png

In that example, half of the data is not mirrored on the other half. As the combination is the same, why the values are not mirrored?
For example, "Bone_Marrow" row and "Spleen" column should not have the same value as "Spleen" row and "Bone_Marrow" column?

I assume that this is the reason why "tribar" mode is not recommended for "count" or "frac", but why this happen?
Would you mind to clarify? And how to interpret this in the correct way?

If I plot correlation , let's say "pearson", this doesn't happen and I get mirrored values as I would expected. Would this be a solution?
If so, what negative values are saying to me in this case? Would that be that instead of being negative correlate (variable A increases while B decreases or vice-versa) it would be close to zero (-1 = 0 overlaps)?

Thank you for your time

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions