Calibrate Phidget attached Thermometer #809
-
I have a Phidget 1048-0 and 2 Thermometers (thermocouples) attached. I can see they are off by 4-8 degrees F, but I can't figure how to 'adjust' or calibrate them. Phidget tells me it's via the software displaying the temp (so, Artisan) and send me some Python code examples. TIA |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is an FAQ. Did you study the Artisan Help page and its list of FAQ? There you find There is a delta between the Artisan readings and those displayed on my machine. How to fix this? which links to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"I can see they are off by 4-8 degrees F" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That makes sense.
Much easier to test with ice water… so I started there.
I appreciated the explanation of the ‘x+3’… I assumed that was correct, but had no idea why folks were putting x in there, or why someone would put ‘x*1.03’, etc… not sure where the ‘legend’ is that explains the formula elements.
I am simply trying to get my temp readout to be exactly accurate, like I do with my smoking of meat.
Roast temp at 145… I want to know it is exactly 145.
If I can not expect that, I just need to know what I can expect.
That is what I’m trying to do.
Thank you. I appreciate the replies!
Process > Outcome
Chad Carrington
515-306-4090
***@***.***
From: Marko Luther ***@***.***>
Reply-To: artisan-roaster-scope/artisan ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, February 4, 2022 at 7:18 AM
To: artisan-roaster-scope/artisan ***@***.***>
Cc: techmaster70 ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [artisan-roaster-scope/artisan] Calibrate Phidget attached Thermometer (Discussion #809)
Why testing in ice water? This is a temperaturepoint far away from the expected roasting temperatures. As any offset can be expected to be somewhat non-linear over the temperature range, wouldn't it makes more sense to test at boiling temperature or higher?
The expected temperature offset for standard quality TCs is 1-3.6°F.
Without you sharing what you do it is impossible to help you out here.
A formula you might put in the BT y(x) field would be "x+3" for the probe that reads 3 degrees to low to lift it up by those 3 degrees.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As was mentioned the offset is not linear so no matter whether you use an addition formula or multiplication formula it will very throughout the roast. I originally had that implemented in eventually abandoned it learning to trust my senses how the Roaster was behaving. 3° doesn’t matter once you become accustomed to how your Roaster works
Michael Herbert
CarefreeBuzzBuzz
… On Feb 4, 2022, at 8:50 AM, techmaster70 ***@***.***> wrote:
That makes sense.
Much easier to test with ice water… so I started there.
I appreciated the explanation of the ‘x+3’… I assumed that was correct, but had no idea why folks were putting x in there, or why someone would put ‘x*1.03’, etc… not sure where the ‘legend’ is that explains the formula elements.
I am simply trying to get my temp readout to be exactly accurate, like I do with my smoking of meat.
Roast temp at 145… I want to know it is exactly 145.
If I can not expect that, I just need to know what I can expect.
That is what I’m trying to do.
Thank you. I appreciate the replies!
Process > Outcome
Chad Carrington
515-306-4090
***@***.***
From: Marko Luther ***@***.***>
Reply-To: artisan-roaster-scope/artisan ***@***.***>
Date: Friday, February 4, 2022 at 7:18 AM
To: artisan-roaster-scope/artisan ***@***.***>
Cc: techmaster70 ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [artisan-roaster-scope/artisan] Calibrate Phidget attached Thermometer (Discussion #809)
Why testing in ice water? This is a temperaturepoint far away from the expected roasting temperatures. As any offset can be expected to be somewhat non-linear over the temperature range, wouldn't it makes more sense to test at boiling temperature or higher?
The expected temperature offset for standard quality TCs is 1-3.6°F.
Without you sharing what you do it is impossible to help you out here.
A formula you might put in the BT y(x) field would be "x+3" for the probe that reads 3 degrees to low to lift it up by those 3 degrees.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
In Artisan, when you go to "Config/Device...", you go in the "Symbol ET/BT" tab
In the ET & BT fields you can type a formula to compensate and correct to the real value with a formula as shown in my fake example.