Replies: 3 comments
-
As far to have a (how do they say it) 'whole abstraction' it's indeed something to have both. But I'm not an expert in APIM and certificates used within that context, so I can't bring much added value to the usefulness for this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Certainly! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Okay, will be turning this into an "issue" then! Thanks to both for the feedback! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Would it - in order to be complete - make sense to provide an additional function next to the one specified in #134 , to also provide the capability to upload a private certificate in the APIM Certificate store?
Although the actions required are far less complex than uploading a public certificate in the CA Certificate store:
(see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/az.apimanagement/new-azapimanagementcertificate?view=azps-5.5.0)
This would have the same parameters + 1 additional:
It would offer a complete set allowing users to upload both private and public certificate via 1 Arcus-library.
cc: @stijnmoreels , @tomkerkhove
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions