Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I tried to remove the Tomcat plugin, and although it could achieve the goal of intercepting the HTTP interface by the Spring MVC component, I found that the traceId had changed to N/A, so I rolled it back |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Tomcat plugin doesn't impact Spring MVC plugin at all. We have internal mechanism to skip that. So, Tomcat plugin removed or not, it is transparent. And about your config, what is the point of toolkit.* ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When I was testing locally, I enabled the
parameter, hoping that MVC requests in the code could be intercepted and display fully qualified class names, which was all as expected, like this:
After deploying to the development environment, I used the same plugin. I packaged Docker images locally, and the development environment deployed them based on the packaged images using k8s. Therefore, theoretically, Java agents are completely identical. They call the same HTTP interface, but are intercepted by Tomcat components and displayed as URLs. Why and how should I solve this problem. like this:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions