[Ideas] Review the necessity of all CBDB-specified GUCs, and clean up those useless or rarely used ones #699
Unanswered
jianlirong
asked this question in
Ideas / Feature Requests
Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, there are too many GUCs, and it is hard to understand what GUCs to use. Maybe we could keep DEVELOPER_OPTIONS GUCs which are invisible to user, and reduce user visible GUCs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
As discussed in #693, there are currently over 400 CBDB-specified GUCs, which makes it very difficult for a user to select the correct one and its corresponding value. We need to revisit all CBDB-specified GUCs and remove those that are redundant or seldom used.
At the end of the day, when developing a database, we should strive to minimize the difficulty for users to use it, rather than increasing it.
Use case/motivation
We want to reduce the number of CBDB-specified GUCs to a few dozen, focusing on those that are essential and frequently used.
Related issues
#693
Are you willing to submit a PR?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions