Replies: 2 comments
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
well... since nothing's going on here, I'll just use whatever names I feel like :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What should the repo names be?
Initially we plan to create and two language bindings for the SDK JVM/Java and Swift.
So, should we follow the org name pattern or the language name pattern (official, if there is any, or natural - based the majority of other repos for that language).
In our case it would be
alpaca-core-jvm
(oralpaca-core-java
)alpaca-core-swift
J
.JAlpacaCore
,AlpacaCoreJ
AlpacaCoreSwift
SwiftyAlpaca
,Ac4j
,JavacaCore
, or if we do lua,aluapaca-core
... you get the pictureBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions