You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently trying to learn and understand your code. I noticed that the inverse covariance matrix computed by the project_gaussians_2d_scale_rot function is inconsistent with the result derived from the traditional formula. It seems like this might be related to a difference in the coordinate system (e.g., between a left-handed and right-handed system).
I also looked into the source code of the project_gaussians_2d_scale_rot_forward_kernel, rotmat2d, and scale_to_mat2d functions. From what I can see, your calculations seem consistent with the traditional formula. However, the computed result is still different. Specifically, your result is [0.1, 0.06, 0.1], while mine is [0.1, -0.06, 0.1].
Could you please clarify which coordinate system your implementation uses? And why do the results differ despite the calculations appearing to follow the traditional formula?
I am currently trying to learn and understand your code. I noticed that the inverse covariance matrix computed by the
project_gaussians_2d_scale_rot
function is inconsistent with the result derived from the traditional formula. It seems like this might be related to a difference in the coordinate system (e.g., between a left-handed and right-handed system).I also looked into the source code of the
project_gaussians_2d_scale_rot_forward_kernel
,rotmat2d
, andscale_to_mat2d
functions. From what I can see, your calculations seem consistent with the traditional formula. However, the computed result is still different. Specifically, your result is [0.1, 0.06, 0.1], while mine is [0.1, -0.06, 0.1].Could you please clarify which coordinate system your implementation uses? And why do the results differ despite the calculations appearing to follow the traditional formula?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: