Skip to content

Reproducibility of Paper Results #17

@marja-w

Description

@marja-w

Hello,

I have been trying to reproduce the results that you have presented in the paper, but my pre-trained and fine-tuned adapters only achieve an accuracy of about 0.6 on the GLUE dataset (using 4_pretrain_adapter.py, glue_1_download_glue.sh, glue_2_finetune_adapter.sh).

Since the random walks are generated using a probability, could you share the exact random walks that you used in your experiment? Maybe the bad performance is caused by the difference in training data.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions