|
| 1 | +;; NOTE: Assertions have been generated by update_lit_checks.py --all-items and should not be edited. |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +;; RUN: foreach %s %t wasm-opt --type-ssa -all -S -o - | filecheck %s |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +(module |
| 6 | + (rec |
| 7 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 8 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $struct (descriptor $desc (struct))) |
| 9 | + (type $struct (descriptor $desc (struct))) |
| 10 | + ;; CHECK: (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct (field i32))))) |
| 11 | + (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct (field i32))))) |
| 12 | + ) |
| 13 | + ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func (result (ref $desc)))) |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + ;; CHECK: (func $no-opt-desc (type $2) (result (ref $desc)) |
| 16 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $desc) |
| 17 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 18 | + (func $no-opt-desc (result (ref $desc)) |
| 19 | + ;; If we tried to optimize this allocation, we would have to create a new |
| 20 | + ;; type for our new descriptor type to describe. This isn't very useful |
| 21 | + ;; unless we can optimize a corresponding allocation of the described type, |
| 22 | + ;; so do not optimize here. |
| 23 | + (struct.new_default $desc) |
| 24 | + ) |
| 25 | +) |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +(module |
| 28 | + (rec |
| 29 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 30 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 31 | + (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 32 | + ;; CHECK: (type $desc (describes $struct (struct))) |
| 33 | + (type $desc (sub final (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 34 | + ) |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | + ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func (result (ref $struct)))) |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + ;; CHECK: (func $final-desc (type $2) (result (ref $struct)) |
| 39 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $struct |
| 40 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $desc) |
| 41 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 42 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 43 | + (func $final-desc (result (ref $struct)) |
| 44 | + ;; We could optimize the allocation of the struct, but we would need to |
| 45 | + ;; update the descriptor to be a corresponding new subtype. The descriptor |
| 46 | + ;; is final, so this is not posssible and we cannot optimize. |
| 47 | + (struct.new_default $struct |
| 48 | + (struct.new $desc) |
| 49 | + ) |
| 50 | + ) |
| 51 | +) |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +(module |
| 54 | + (rec |
| 55 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 56 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 57 | + (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 58 | + ;; CHECK: (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 59 | + (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 60 | + ) |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func (result (ref $struct)))) |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | + ;; CHECK: (func $opt (type $2) (result (ref $struct)) |
| 65 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $struct |
| 66 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $desc) |
| 67 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 68 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 69 | + (func $opt (result (ref $struct)) |
| 70 | + ;; Now we could optimize, but we would still have to introduce a new |
| 71 | + ;; descriptor subtype. We do not support this yet. |
| 72 | + (struct.new_default $struct |
| 73 | + (struct.new $desc) |
| 74 | + ) |
| 75 | + ) |
| 76 | +) |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +(module |
| 79 | + (rec |
| 80 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 81 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $A (sub (descriptor $B (struct (field i32))))) |
| 82 | + (type $A (sub (descriptor $B (struct (field i32))))) |
| 83 | + ;; CHECK: (type $B (sub (describes $A (descriptor $C (struct))))) |
| 84 | + (type $B (sub (describes $A (descriptor $C (struct))))) |
| 85 | + ;; CHECK: (type $C (sub (describes $B (descriptor $D (struct))))) |
| 86 | + (type $C (sub (describes $B (descriptor $D (struct))))) |
| 87 | + ;; CHECK: (type $D (sub (describes $C (struct)))) |
| 88 | + (type $D (sub (describes $C (struct)))) |
| 89 | + ) |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + ;; CHECK: (type $4 (func (result (ref $A)))) |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + ;; CHECK: (func $opt-chain (type $4) (result (ref $A)) |
| 94 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $A |
| 95 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $B |
| 96 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $C |
| 97 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $D) |
| 98 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 99 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 100 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 101 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 102 | + (func $opt-chain (result (ref $A)) |
| 103 | + ;; Now optimizing would require updating a whole chain of descriptors. |
| 104 | + (struct.new_default $A |
| 105 | + (struct.new $B |
| 106 | + (struct.new $C |
| 107 | + (struct.new $D) |
| 108 | + ) |
| 109 | + ) |
| 110 | + ) |
| 111 | + ) |
| 112 | +) |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +(module |
| 115 | + (rec |
| 116 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 117 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 118 | + (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 119 | + ;; CHECK: (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 120 | + (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 121 | + ) |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func (result (ref $struct)))) |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + ;; CHECK: (global $desc (ref (exact $desc)) (struct.new_default $desc)) |
| 126 | + (global $desc (ref (exact $desc)) (struct.new $desc)) |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + ;; CHECK: (func $global-desc (type $2) (result (ref $struct)) |
| 129 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $struct |
| 130 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $desc) |
| 131 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 132 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 133 | + (func $global-desc (result (ref $struct)) |
| 134 | + ;; Optimizing below would require creating a new global to hold the new |
| 135 | + ;; descriptor subtype. |
| 136 | + (struct.new_default $struct |
| 137 | + (global.get $desc) |
| 138 | + ) |
| 139 | + ) |
| 140 | +) |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +(module |
| 143 | + (rec |
| 144 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 145 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 146 | + (type $struct (sub (descriptor $desc (struct (field i32))))) |
| 147 | + ;; CHECK: (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 148 | + (type $desc (sub (describes $struct (struct)))) |
| 149 | + ) |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | + ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func (result i32))) |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + ;; CHECK: (global $desc (ref (exact $desc)) (struct.new_default $desc)) |
| 154 | + (global $desc (ref (exact $desc)) (struct.new $desc)) |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + ;; CHECK: (func $no-opt-desc-identity (type $2) (result i32) |
| 157 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (ref.eq |
| 158 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (ref.get_desc $struct |
| 159 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (block (result (ref (exact $struct))) |
| 160 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $struct |
| 161 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $desc) |
| 162 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 163 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 164 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 165 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $desc) |
| 166 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 167 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 168 | + (func $no-opt-desc-identity (result i32) |
| 169 | + ;; Same as above, but now we cannot optimize because the identity of the |
| 170 | + ;; descriptors matters and we cannot replace them with different subtypes. |
| 171 | + (ref.eq |
| 172 | + (ref.get_desc $struct |
| 173 | + ;; Use a block to stop the ref.get_desc from observing the exactness of |
| 174 | + ;; the allocation, which would separately inhibit optimization. |
| 175 | + (block (result (ref $struct)) |
| 176 | + (struct.new_default $struct |
| 177 | + (global.get $desc) |
| 178 | + ) |
| 179 | + ) |
| 180 | + ) |
| 181 | + (global.get $desc) |
| 182 | + ) |
| 183 | + ) |
| 184 | +) |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +(module |
| 187 | + (rec |
| 188 | + ;; CHECK: (rec |
| 189 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (type $A (sub (descriptor $B (struct (field i32))))) |
| 190 | + (type $A (sub (descriptor $B (struct (field i32))))) |
| 191 | + ;; CHECK: (type $B (sub (describes $A (descriptor $C (struct))))) |
| 192 | + (type $B (sub (describes $A (descriptor $C (struct))))) |
| 193 | + ;; CHECK: (type $C (sub (describes $B (descriptor $D (struct))))) |
| 194 | + (type $C (sub (describes $B (descriptor $D (struct))))) |
| 195 | + ;; CHECK: (type $D (sub (describes $C (struct)))) |
| 196 | + (type $D (sub (describes $C (struct)))) |
| 197 | + ) |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | + ;; CHECK: (type $4 (func (result (ref $A)))) |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | + ;; CHECK: (global $D (ref (exact $D)) (struct.new_default $D)) |
| 202 | + (global $D (ref (exact $D)) (struct.new $D)) |
| 203 | + ;; CHECK: (global $C (ref (exact $C)) (struct.new_default $C |
| 204 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $D) |
| 205 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: )) |
| 206 | + (global $C (ref (exact $C)) (struct.new $C (global.get $D))) |
| 207 | + ;; CHECK: (global $B (ref (exact $B)) (struct.new_default $B |
| 208 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $C) |
| 209 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: )) |
| 210 | + (global $B (ref (exact $B)) (struct.new $B (global.get $C))) |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + ;; CHECK: (func $opt-global-chain (type $4) (result (ref $A)) |
| 213 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (struct.new_default $A |
| 214 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: (global.get $B) |
| 215 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 216 | + ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) |
| 217 | + (func $opt-global-chain (result (ref $A)) |
| 218 | + ;; Same as above, but now we would have to copy a whole chain of descriptor |
| 219 | + ;; globals. |
| 220 | + (struct.new_default $A |
| 221 | + (global.get $B) |
| 222 | + ) |
| 223 | + ) |
| 224 | +) |
0 commit comments