Skip to content

DynamicPPL..jl tests 23 Broken. #601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
iajzenszmi opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

DynamicPPL..jl tests 23 Broken. #601

iajzenszmi opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@iajzenszmi
Copy link

│ Unless this is due to a configuration error, the relevant variable should be set explicitly.
└ @ Documenter ~/.julia/packages/Documenter/CJeWX/src/utilities/utilities.jl:640
[ Info: SetupBuildDirectory: setting up build directory.
[ Info: Doctest: running doctests.
[ Info: Skipped ExpandTemplates step (doctest only).
[ Info: Skipped CrossReferences step (doctest only).
[ Info: Skipped CheckDocument step (doctest only).
[ Info: Skipped Populate step (doctest only).
[ Info: Skipped RenderDocument step (doctest only).
Activating project at ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/UsxSC/test/turing
Resolving package versions...
┌ Info: Not compatible with this release. No problem.
└ exception = empty intersection between DynamicPPL@0.25.3 and project compatibility 0.24
Test Summary: | Pass Broken Total Time
DynamicPPL.jl | 16783 23 16806 41m56.5s
Testing DynamicPPL tests passed
Screenshot from 2024-05-03 07-09-57

@yebai
Copy link
Member

yebai commented May 6, 2024

@sunxd3 can you take a look?

@torfjelde
Copy link
Member

Exactly what is the issue here? I don't think I see anything strange here. Tests are passing and the turing tests weren't running because we hadn't yet made a compatible release.

@torfjelde
Copy link
Member

@iajzenszmi Note that tests that are "broken" are marked so on purpose:) Hence why tests are considered to be "passing" overall

@yebai yebai closed this as completed May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants