Scale the stage size independently of the output size in the editor

[Forysium]

It triggers me a bit that the stage is so big in the editor if you use custom screen size even at the smallest size setting at 1920x1080 pixels for example, there is hardly any space for the rest. Perhaps it would be possible to scale the stage size in the editor independently of the size as it appears packaged.

[GarboMuffin]

you're not supposed to use sizes like 1920x1080; use something like 640x360 and let fullscreen upscale it for you

[Forysium]

wouldnt that totally mess up the quality if i use raster images?

[BlueDome77]

Some of us just want to use Turbowarp to its full potential and create projects with a higher resolution. (i.e. Publishing on itch.io, Game Jolt)

[n-d-v]

wouldnt that totally mess up the quality if i use raster images?

you could try using vector images, though that would cause a lot of colour banding if you use a png to vector converter

[darekashiranai]

if you develop for mobile, you should go with 1920x1080 - there's no good alternative - unfortunately scratch was limited by design - fitting the selection menu, the code, the stage, and maybe ingame menu's all on 1 screen with very limited resize options in the gui is probably the biggest reason people who love scratch still go for another solution, its just so frustrating. Really wish we could get the multi-monitor support that would help a lot !

[CST1229]

don't go with 1920x1080. like the popup says, use a smaller resolution (and the hd upload addon for high resolution bitmaps). though i feel like a better alternative would be to allow customizing the bitmap resolution scale to allow for high resolution bitmaps (scratch's project.json format already allows changing this)