Skip to content

Generic encoding with field names #39

@kirelagin

Description

@kirelagin

Currently the generic encoding turns records into simple sequences of fields.

Would it make sense to change the encoding for records or provide an alternative encoding that will store records as maps, similar to what aeson does?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions