Performance Question #3406
Unanswered
Pack3tL0ss
asked this question in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I maintain a CLI app that uses rich to render the output. This works great in most environments, but I've recently used it in a couple of environments where the number of records returned is extensive (70k plus). This is rendered as a rich.Table with 70k+ rows.
I currently capture the table with
This takes an excessive amount of time to render, which may be expected, was just curious if there was a better way that would improve performance??
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions