Support for alternative TLS backends #238
dignifiedquire
started this conversation in
Ideas(新功能的建议和讨论)
Replies: 3 comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
-
Adding support for rustls, would likely make supporting windows #44 easier as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Our current design encapsulates the dependency on the TLS library. We did this on purpose so we can easily switch to or add other TLS libraries later on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am currently looking at alternatives for
quinn
, but due to my current usage, I am relying onrustls
for TLS handling (platform support, and custom certificate verification). So I was wondering if you are open to enabling different TLS backends. Either in a fully generic form, or by feature flagging boringssl & rustls.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions