What's the deal with "TanStack Loaders"?

[shorn]

The TanStack Router doco talks about something called TanStack Loaders:

But the link gives a 404. There's also a "TanStack Loaders" listed on https://tanstack.com/, but the link just goes back to the TanStack home page.

Is this "Loaders" project a new work-in-progress (or maybe something that is being deprecated/removed?)
Doco seems to imply it's slimmer, both in terms of features and size.

Should I just ignore Loaders for the moment and stick to using Query with Router?

Related to this - is the project open to GitHub issues raised on doco that needs improvement? If so, do you want lots of little issues or one big issue listing a bunch of stuff? I'm open to submitting PR's as long as the contribution guidelines are correct in that I don't have to commit to a CLA or similar.

[tannerlinsley]

Loaders is a lighter weight alternative to Query. PRs are accepted. The smaller pr size, the better.

…

On Aug 23, 2023 at 12:22 AM -0600, Shorn ***@***.***>, wrote: The TanStack Router doco talks about something called TanStack Loaders: But the link gives a 404. There's also a "TanStack Loaders" listed on https://tanstack.com/, but the link just goes back to the TanStack home page. Is this "Loaders" project a new work-in-progress (or maybe something that is being deprecated/removed?) Doco seems to imply it's slimmer, both in terms of features and size. Should I just ignore Loaders for the moment and stick to using Query with Router? Related to this - is the project open to GitHub issues raised on doco that needs improvement? If so, do you want lots of little issues or one big issue listing a bunch of stuff? I'm open to submitting PR's as long as the contribution guidelines are correct in that I don't have to commit to a CLA or similar. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>