Project Rubric Scoring Criteria

Project Rubric Scoring Criteria

	Grade: A - A- 100%-86%	Grade: B+ - B- 85%-70%	Grade: C+ - C- 60%-69%	Grade: F 59% and Below	Total Points
Presentation (10 points)	Text and graphics enhanced communication of ideas.No spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.Key points were clearly and concisely explained.Delivery was professional and fluent.	Text and graphics clearly supported communication of ideas.Very few spelling, punctuation or grammar errors.Key points were clearly explained. Delivery was professional in nature.	Text and graphics were mostly appropriate for the content.Some spelling, punctuation or grammar errors. Key points were communicated adequately.Delivery was mostly clear and professional.	Text and graphics were often inappropriate.Significant spelling, punctuation or grammar, errors. Key points were often not clearly presented.Delivery was stilted, awkward or unprofessional.
Documentation(20%)	Simple, clear, easy to interpret, easy to read. Well coordinated with content, well designed, used very effectively, obey the writing rules very well.	Usually clear, easy to interpret, easy to read. Generally well coordinated with content, design was okay, generally used effectively, almost obeying the writing rules.	Marginally acceptable, too complex, crowded, difficult to read or interpret. Adequate coordination with content. Used only adequately, some points are against the writing rules.	Poor quality visual aids (or none), hard to read, technically inaccurate, poorly constructed. Poor coordination with content. Used poorly. Didn't obey the writhing rules
Teamwork and Management(20 points)	The team worked well together to achieve objectives. Each member contributed in a valuable way to the project. All data sources indicated a high level of mutual respect and collaboration. Issues and risks were very well managed.	The team worked well together most of the time, with only a few occurrences of communication breakdown or failure to collaborate when appropriate.Members were mostly respectful of each other. Most of the issues and risks were addressed and solved appropriately.	Text and graphics were mostly appropriate for the content.Some spelling, punctuation or grammar errors. Key points were communicated adequately.Delivery was mostly clear and professional.	Text and graphics were often inappropriate.Significant spelling, punctuation or grammar, errors. Key points were often not clearly presented.Delivery was stilted, awkward or unprofessional.	The team worked well together most of the time, there were times of communication breakdown or failure to collaborate but were able to figure out the problem on compromises.
Members were mostly respectful of each other. Only some main issues and risks were listed.	Team did not collaborate or communicate well.Some members wouldwork independently, without regard to objectives or priorities. A lack of respect and regard was frequently noted. Issues and risks were recorded casually.
Project Demo and/or Prototype(20 points)	The demonstration was imaginative and effective in conveying ideas to the
audience. Product features were very well illustrated.	The demonstration techniques used were effective in conveying most of the ideas, appropriate most of the time. Most of the features of the product were presented.	The demonstration techniques used were effective in conveying main ideas, but a bit unimaginative.Only a few features were mentioned.	The demonstration failed to capture the interest of the audience and/or is confusing in what was communicated. Few features were considered.
Project solutions(30 points)	The deliverable was well organized and clearly written. The underlying logic was clearly articulated and easy to follow. Diagrams or analyses enhanced and clarified presentation of ideas.	The deliverable was organized and clearly written for the most Part. Diagrams were consistent with the text.	The deliverable was organized and written. In some areas the logic and/or flow of ideas were difficult to follow, diagrams were inconsistent with the text.	The deliverable lacked overall organization. The reader had to make considerable effort to understand the underlying logic and flow of ideas. Diagrams were absent or inconsistent with the text.