diff --git a/rules/S7524/metadata.json b/rules/S7524/metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2c63c085104
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S7524/metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+{
+}
diff --git a/rules/S7524/python/metadata.json b/rules/S7524/python/metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2d1053825e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S7524/python/metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "title": "\"async for\" should be used for asynchronous iterators",
+  "type": "CODE_SMELL",
+  "status": "ready",
+  "remediation": {
+    "func": "Constant/Issue",
+    "constantCost": "5min"
+  },
+  "tags": [
+    "async"
+  ],
+  "defaultSeverity": "Minor",
+  "ruleSpecification": "RSPEC-7524",
+  "sqKey": "S7524",
+  "scope": "All",
+  "defaultQualityProfiles": ["Sonar way"],
+  "quickfix": "covered",
+  "code": {
+    "impacts": {
+      "MAINTAINABILITY": "LOW",
+      "RELIABILITY": "LOW"
+    },
+    "attribute": "CONVENTIONAL"
+  }
+}
diff --git a/rules/S7524/python/rule.adoc b/rules/S7524/python/rule.adoc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c5792bad24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/S7524/python/rule.adoc
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+This rule raises an issue when a synchronous `for` loop is used with an iterator implementing the asynchronous iteration protocol.
+
+== Why is this an issue?
+
+When working inside an `async` function, you should use `async for` to iterate over asynchronous iterators. An asynchronous iterator is an object that provides `+__aiter__+` and `+__anext__+` methods and should be used instead of a synchronous `for` loop.
+
+=== What is the potential impact?
+
+Not following the proper async pattern can lead to:
+
+* **Incorrect Logic**: It shows a misunderstanding of the asynchronous nature of the data source.
+* **Inconsistent async usage**: Mixing synchronous and asynchronous iteration patterns makes code harder to read and maintain.
+
+== How to fix it
+
+Use the `async for` statement to iterate over asynchronous iterators inside an `async` function.
+
+=== Code examples
+
+==== Noncompliant code example
+
+[source,python,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
+----
+class MyIterator:
+    def __init__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __iter__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __next__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __aiter__(self):
+        ...
+
+    async def __anext__(self):
+        ...
+
+async def main():
+    for _ in MyIterator(): # Noncompliant
+        ...
+----
+
+==== Compliant solution
+
+[source,python,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
+----
+class MyIterator:
+    def __init__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __iter__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __next__(self):
+        ...
+
+    def __aiter__(self):
+        ...
+
+    async def __anext__(self):
+        ...
+
+async def main():
+    async for _ in MyIterator(): # Compliant
+        ...
+----
+
+ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
+
+== Implementation Specification
+(visible only on this page)
+
+=== Message
+
+Use "async for" for asynchronous iterators
+
+Consider implementing quickfix to replace the `for` keyword with `async for`.
+
+=== Highlighting
+
+* Primary location: The `for` keyword of the loop.
+* Secondary locations: The `async` keyword of the enclosing function
+* Secondary locations: The `+__aiter__+` and `+__anext__+` methods if we can get the location
+endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
+
+== Resources
+
+=== Documentation
+
+* Python Documentation - https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-async-for-statement[The async for statement]
+* Python Documentation - https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#the-iterator-protocol[The iterator protocol]
+* Python Documentation - https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#asynchronous-iterators[Asynchronous Iterators]