You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the verifier has both special_kfunc_set and special_kfunc_list.
When adding a new kfunc usage to the verifier, it is often confusing
about whether special_kfunc_set or special_kfunc_list or both should
add that kfunc. For example, some kfuncs, e.g., bpf_dynptr_from_skb,
bpf_dynptr_clone, bpf_wq_set_callback_impl, does not need to be
in special_kfunc_set.
To avoid potential future confusion, special_kfunc_set is deleted
and btf_id_set_contains(&special_kfunc_set, ...) is removed.
The code is refactored with a new func check_special_kfunc(),
which contains all codes covered by original branch
meta.btf == btf_vmlinux && btf_id_set_contains(&special_kfunc_set, meta.func_id)
There is no functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250523205321.1291431-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
0 commit comments