You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This commit adds srcu_read_{,un}lock_fast(), which is similar
to srcu_read_{,un}lock_lite(), but avoids the array-indexing and
pointer-following overhead. On a microbenchmark featuring tight
loops around empty readers, this results in about a 20% speedup
compared to RCU Tasks Trace on my x86 laptop.
Please note that SRCU-fast has drawbacks compared to RCU Tasks
Trace, including:
o Lack of CPU stall warnings.
o SRCU-fast readers permitted only where rcu_is_watching().
o A pointer-sized return value from srcu_read_lock_fast() must
be passed to the corresponding srcu_read_unlock_fast().
o In the absence of readers, a synchronize_srcu() having _fast()
readers will incur the latency of at least two normal RCU grace
periods.
o RCU Tasks Trace priority boosting could be easily added.
Boosting SRCU readers is more difficult.
SRCU-fast also has a drawback compared to SRCU-lite, namely that the
return value from srcu_read_lock_fast()-fast is a 64-bit pointer and
that from srcu_read_lock_lite() is only a 32-bit int.
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Akira Yokosawa. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
0 commit comments