You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most callers of memcg_slab_free_hook() already know the slab, which could
be passed to memcg_slab_free_hook() directly to reduce the overhead of an
another call of virt_to_slab(). For bulk freeing of objects, the call of
slab_objcgs() in the loop in memcg_slab_free_hook() is redundant as well.
Rework memcg_slab_free_hook() and build_detached_freelist() to reduce
those unnecessary overhead and make memcg_slab_free_hook() can handle bulk
freeing in slab_free().
Move the calling site of memcg_slab_free_hook() from do_slab_free() to
slab_free() for slub to make the code clearer since the logic is weird
(e.g. the caller need to judge whether it needs to call
memcg_slab_free_hook()). It is easy to make mistakes like missing calling
of memcg_slab_free_hook() like fixes of:
commit d1b2cf6 ("mm: memcg/slab: uncharge during kmem_cache_free_bulk()")
commit ae085d7 ("mm: kfence: fix missing objcg housekeeping for SLAB")
This optimization is mainly for bulk objects freeing. The following numbers
is shown for 16-object freeing.
before after
kmem_cache_free_bulk: ~430 ns ~400 ns
The overhead is reduced by about 7% for 16-object freeing.
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429123044.37885-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
0 commit comments