You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
sched/numa: fix memory leak due to the overwritten vma->numab_state
[Problem Description]
When running the hackbench program of LTP, the following memory leak is
reported by kmemleak.
# /opt/ltp/testcases/bin/hackbench 20 thread 1000
Running with 20*40 (== 800) tasks.
# dmesg | grep kmemleak
...
kmemleak: 480 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
kmemleak: 665 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
unreferenced object 0xffff888cd8ca2c40 (size 64):
comm "hackbench", pid 17142, jiffies 4299780315
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
ac 74 49 00 01 00 00 00 4c 84 49 00 01 00 00 00 .tI.....L.I.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace (crc bff18fd4):
[<ffffffff81419a89>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x2f9/0x3f0
[<ffffffff8113f715>] task_numa_work+0x725/0xa00
[<ffffffff8110f878>] task_work_run+0x58/0x90
[<ffffffff81ddd9f8>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1c8/0x1e0
[<ffffffff81dd78d5>] do_syscall_64+0x85/0x150
[<ffffffff81e0012b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
...
This issue can be consistently reproduced on three different servers:
* a 448-core server
* a 256-core server
* a 192-core server
[Root Cause]
Since multiple threads are created by the hackbench program (along with
the command argument 'thread'), a shared vma might be accessed by two or
more cores simultaneously. When two or more cores observe that
vma->numab_state is NULL at the same time, vma->numab_state will be
overwritten.
Although current code ensures that only one thread scans the VMAs in a
single 'numa_scan_period', there might be a chance for another thread
to enter in the next 'numa_scan_period' while we have not gotten till
numab_state allocation [1].
Note that the command `/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/hackbench 50 process 1000`
cannot the reproduce the issue. It is verified with 200+ test runs.
[Solution]
Use the cmpxchg atomic operation to ensure that only one thread executes
the vma->numab_state assignment.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1794be3c-358c-4cdc-a43d-a1f841d91ef7@amd.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241113102146.2384-1-ahuang12@lenovo.com
Fixes: ef6a22b ("sched/numa: apply the scan delay to every new vma")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Reported-by: Jiwei Sun <sunjw10@lenovo.com>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0 commit comments