You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
binfmt_elf: Support segments with 0 filesz and misaligned starts
Implement a helper elf_load() that wraps elf_map() and performs all
of the necessary work to ensure that when "memsz > filesz" the bytes
described by "memsz > filesz" are zeroed.
An outstanding issue is if the first segment has filesz 0, and has a
randomized location. But that is the same as today.
In this change I replaced an open coded padzero() that did not clear
all of the way to the end of the page, with padzero() that does.
I also stopped checking the return of padzero() as there is at least
one known case where testing for failure is the wrong thing to do.
It looks like binfmt_elf_fdpic may have the proper set of tests
for when error handling can be safely completed.
I found a couple of commits in the old history
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git,
that look very interesting in understanding this code.
commit 39b56d9 ("[PATCH] binfmt_elf: clearing bss may fail")
commit c6e2227 ("[SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c")
commit 5bf3be0 ("v2.4.10.1 -> v2.4.10.2")
Looking at commit 39b56d9 ("[PATCH] binfmt_elf: clearing bss may fail"):
> commit 39b56d9
> Author: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date: Wed Feb 9 22:40:30 2005 -0800
>
> [PATCH] binfmt_elf: clearing bss may fail
>
> So we discover that Borland's Kylix application builder emits weird elf
> files which describe a non-writeable bss segment.
>
> So remove the clear_user() check at the place where we zero out the bss. I
> don't _think_ there are any security implications here (plus we've never
> checked that clear_user() return value, so whoops if it is a problem).
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
It seems pretty clear that binfmt_elf_fdpic with skipping clear_user() for
non-writable segments and otherwise calling clear_user(), aka padzero(),
and checking it's return code is the right thing to do.
I just skipped the error checking as that avoids breaking things.
And notably, it looks like Borland's Kylix died in 2005 so it might be
safe to just consider read-only segments with memsz > filesz an error.
Reported-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914-bss-alloc-v1-1-78de67d2c6dd@weissschuh.net
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sf71f123.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org
Tested-by: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929032435.2391507-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
0 commit comments