You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The use of struct range in the CXL subsystem is growing. In particular,
the addition of Dynamic Capacity devices uses struct range in a number
of places which are reported in debug and error messages.
To wit requiring the printing of the start/end fields in each print
became cumbersome. Dan Williams mentions in [1] that it might be time
to have a print specifier for struct range similar to struct resource.
A few alternatives were considered including '%par', '%r', and '%pn'.
%pra follows that struct range is similar to struct resource (%p[rR])
but needs to be different. Based on discussions with Petr and Andy
'%pra' was chosen.[2]
Andy also suggested to keep the range prints similar to struct resource
though combined code. Add hex_range() to handle printing for both
pointer types.
Finally introduce DEFINE_RANGE() as a parallel to DEFINE_RES_*() and use
it in the tests.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/663922b475e50_d54d72945b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66cea3bf3332f_f937b29424@iweiny-mobl.notmuch/ [2]
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241025-cxl-pra-v2-3-123a825daba2@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
0 commit comments