Skip to content

Commit 38d0e83

Browse files
krzkarndb
authored andcommitted
Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: document dtbs_check requirement for Samsung
Samsung ARM/ARM64 SoCs (except legacy S5PV210) are also expected not to bring any new dtbs_check warnings. In fact this have been already enforced and tested since few release. Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712084131.127982-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
1 parent c25223c commit 38d0e83

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI. Please read the section
133133
more information on the validation of devicetrees.
134134

135135
For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` should not
136-
add any new warnings. For RISC-V, as it has the advantage of being a newer
137-
architecture, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is required to not add any new warnings.
136+
add any new warnings. For RISC-V and Samsung SoC, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is
137+
required to not add any new warnings.
138138
If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree
139139
maintainers.
140140

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)