Proactive Impact Analysis to Fulfill the "AI Dev Team" Promise #5191
inspiration88
started this conversation in
Feature Requests
Replies: 1 comment
-
Seconding this but it needs more analysis on how this can be optimized, and what other "cursor rules" tools are already out there to make assessment easier to do. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Problem Statement
Currently, when the AI is given a task, it operates with a limited, short-sighted context. It executes the immediate instruction correctly but often fails to understand the broader implications of that change across the entire codebase.
This leads to unintended side effects, architectural inconsistencies, and subtle bugs. As a result, the developer must act as a "micromanager," manually reviewing every change and anticipating the problems the AI couldn't foresee. This undermines the core promise of an "AI-Powered Dev Team" and disrupts development flow.
Proposed Solution
Implement a Proactive Impact Analysis Engine. Before writing any code, the AI should perform a task-driven analysis to understand the full scope and consequences of a request.
The workflow should be:
Example User Story
User:
Current AI (Implied Behavior):
Might change one CSS class in one file, potentially missing other definitions or breaking visual consistency.
Proposed AI (The New Dialogue):
Benefits
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions