Ran WGCNA! Interpretation and next steps? #1195
-
Alright, so I was able to complete running WGCNA on my ambient-temperature crabs over days 0, 2, and 17. These libraries are aligned to cbai_transcriptomev2.0, which is not filtered by taxa, and thus it examines both C. bairdi and Hematodinium genes together To speed the process up, I rejected genes with counts below 30 in all samples (recommendation is below 10), so these aren't perfect, but they'll be decent! The heat map is particularly interesting - seems to not show any significant relationships with day (if we set the p-value bar at 0.05), but some interesting relationships with individual crab. I could really use some help both interpreting these results and deciding where to go next.
Any thoughts on what the best way to go from here would be? Sample dendrogram with condition Cluster dendrogram with original and merged eigengenes Clustering of module eigengenes Gene clustering on TOM-based dissimilarity Gene dendrogram with module colors. NOTE: Didn't work at first, as of time of posting this link is broken - will re-run soon, thus hopefully fixing the link |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
sorry if I am missing but is there a image showing expression patterns over 3 days? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Note you can put images in posts 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
sorry if I am missing but is there a image showing expression patterns over 3 days?