|
| 1 | +# To be filled by the author(s) at the time of submission |
| 2 | +# ------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +# Title of the article: |
| 5 | +# - For a successful replication, it shoudl be prefixed with "[Re]" |
| 6 | +# - For a failed replication, it should be prefixed with "[¬Re]" |
| 7 | +# - For other article types, no instruction (but please, not too long) |
| 8 | +title: "[Re] The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network" |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +# List of authors with name, orcid number, email and affiliation |
| 11 | +# Affiliation "*" means contact author |
| 12 | +authors: |
| 13 | + - name: Pauline Bock |
| 14 | + orcid: 0000-0002-9374-8733 |
| 15 | + email: pauline.bock.dev@gmail.com |
| 16 | + affiliations: 1,2,3 |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | + - name: Frédéric Alexandre |
| 19 | + orcid: 0000-0002-6113-1878 |
| 20 | + email: frederic.alexandre@inria.fr |
| 21 | + affiliations: 2,1,3,* # * is for contact author |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +# List of affiliations with code (corresponding to author affiliations), name |
| 24 | +# and address. You can also use these affiliations to add text such as "Equal |
| 25 | +# contributions" as name (with no address). |
| 26 | +affiliations: |
| 27 | + - code: 1 |
| 28 | + name: LaBRI, Université de Bordeaux, Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux, |
| 29 | + Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5800 |
| 30 | + address: Talence, France |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + - code: 2 |
| 34 | + name: INRIA Bordeaux Sud-Ouest |
| 35 | + address: Bordeaux, France |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + - code: 3 |
| 39 | + name: Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, Université de Bordeaux, |
| 40 | + Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5293 |
| 41 | + address: Bordeaux, France |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +# List of keywords (adding the programming language might be a good idea) |
| 45 | +keywords: rescience c, rescience x |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +# Code URL and DOI (url is mandatory for replication, doi after acceptance) |
| 48 | +# You can get a DOI for your code from Zenodo, |
| 49 | +# see https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ |
| 50 | +code: |
| 51 | + - url: https://github.com/PaulineBock/WCSTDehaeneChangeux |
| 52 | + - doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3553566 |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +# Date URL and DOI (optional if no data) |
| 56 | +data: |
| 57 | + - url: |
| 58 | + - doi: |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +# Information about the original article that has been replicated |
| 61 | +replication: |
| 62 | + - cite: > |
| 63 | + Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (1991). The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. Cerebral cortex, 1(1), 62-79. |
| 64 | + - bib: dehaene1991wisconsin |
| 65 | + - url: https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-abstract/1/1/62/408917 |
| 66 | + - doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/1.1.62 |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +# Don't forget to surround abstract with double quotes |
| 69 | +abstract: "Neuropsychologists commonly use the Wisconsin Card |
| 70 | +Sorting Test as a test of the integrity of frontal lobe |
| 71 | +functions. However, an account of its range of validity |
| 72 | +and of the neuronal mechanisms involved is lacking. We |
| 73 | +analyze the test at 3 different levels. First, the different |
| 74 | +versions of the test are described, and the results obtained |
| 75 | +with normal subjects and brain-lesioned patients |
| 76 | +are reviewed. Second, a computational analysis is used |
| 77 | +to reveal what algorithms may pass the test, and to |
| 78 | +predict their respective performances. At this stage, 3 |
| 79 | +cognitive components are isolated that may critically |
| 80 | +contribute to performance: the ability to change the |
| 81 | +current rule when negative reward occurs, the capacity |
| 82 | +to memorize previously tested rules in order to avoid |
| 83 | +testing them twice, and the possibility of rejecting some |
| 84 | +rules a priori by reasoning. Third, a model neuronal |
| 85 | +network embodying these 3 components is described. |
| 86 | +The coding units are clusters of neurons organized in |
| 87 | +layers, or assemblies. A sensorimotor loop enables the |
| 88 | +network to sort the input cards according to several |
| 89 | +criteria (color, form, etc.). A higher-level assembly of |
| 90 | +rule-coding clusters codes for the currently tested rule, |
| 91 | +which shifts when negative reward is received. Internal |
| 92 | +testing of the possible rules, analogous to a reasoning |
| 93 | +process, also occurs, by means of an endogenous autoevaluation |
| 94 | +loop. When lesioned, the model reproduces |
| 95 | +the behavior of frontal lobe patients. Plausible biological |
| 96 | +or molecular implementations are presented for several |
| 97 | +of its components." |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +# Bibliography file (yours) |
| 100 | +bibliography: bibliography.bib |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +# Type of the article |
| 103 | +# Type can be: |
| 104 | +# * Editorial |
| 105 | +# * Letter |
| 106 | +# * Replication |
| 107 | +type: Replication |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +# Scientific domain of the article (e.g. Computational Neuroscience) |
| 110 | +# (one domain only & try to be not overly specific) |
| 111 | +domain: Computational Neuroscience |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +# Coding language (main one only if several) |
| 114 | +language: Python |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +# To be filled by the author(s) after acceptance |
| 118 | +# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +# For example, the URL of the GitHub issue where review actually occured |
| 121 | +review: |
| 122 | + - url: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/7 |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +contributors: |
| 125 | + - name: Olivia Guest |
| 126 | + orcid: 0000-0002-1891-0972 |
| 127 | + role: editor |
| 128 | + - name: Andrea Caso |
| 129 | + orcid: 0000-0003-4904-3610 |
| 130 | + role: reviewer |
| 131 | + - name: Qihong Lu |
| 132 | + orcid: |
| 133 | + role: reviewer |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +# This information will be provided by the editor |
| 136 | +dates: |
| 137 | + - received: September 5, 2019 |
| 138 | + - accepted: October 8, 2019 |
| 139 | + - published: December 9, 2019 |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +# This information will be provided by the editor |
| 142 | +article: |
| 143 | + - number: 3 # Article number will be automatically assigned during publication |
| 144 | + - doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3545905 # DOI from Zenodo |
| 145 | + - url: https://zenodo.org/record/3545905/files/ReScience_Dehaene.pdf # Final PDF URL (Zenodo or rescience website?) |
| 146 | + # - doi: 10.5072/zenodo.416801 |
| 147 | + # - url: https://sandbox.zenodo.org/record/416801/files/ReScience_Dehaene.pdf |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +# This information will be provided by the editor |
| 150 | +journal: |
| 151 | + - name: "ReScience C" |
| 152 | + - issn: ISSN 2430-3658 |
| 153 | + - volume: 5 |
| 154 | + - issue: 1 |
0 commit comments