Skip to content

⚡ Medium Priority: Break down large functions into smaller methods #143

@quantumshiro

Description

@quantumshiro

Problem

Several functions exceed 80+ lines and handle multiple responsibilities, making them difficult to test, maintain, and understand.

Large Functions Identified

File: src/modular/unified_orchestrator.rs

Function: process_events_batch() (Lines 708-747)

  • Size: 40+ lines with complex event processing logic
  • Issue: Multiple responsibilities in single function
  • Solution: Split into:
    fn categorize_events(&self, events: &[Event]) -> EventCategories;
    fn handle_event_by_type(&mut self, event: Event) -> Result<(), Error>;
    fn update_processing_metrics(&mut self, results: &ProcessingResults);

File: src/modular/execution.rs

Function: execute_block() (Lines 240-323)

  • Size: 83 lines with multiple responsibilities
  • Issue: Transaction validation, processing, and state management in one method
  • Solution: Extract methods:
    fn validate_transaction_type(&self, tx: &Transaction) -> Result<TransactionType, ValidationError>;
    fn process_eutxo_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction) -> Result<ExecutionResult, ExecutionError>;
    fn process_account_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction) -> Result<ExecutionResult, ExecutionError>;
    fn apply_block_state_changes(&mut self, results: &[ExecutionResult]) -> Result<(), StateError>;

Function: execute_contract_transaction() (Lines 148-220)

  • Size: 72+ lines handling contract deployment and calls
  • Issue: Mixed deployment and execution logic
  • Solution: Extract handlers:
    struct ContractDeploymentHandler;
    impl ContractDeploymentHandler {
        fn deploy_contract(&self, deployment: ContractDeployment) -> Result<Address, DeploymentError>;
    }
    
    struct ContractCallHandler;
    impl ContractCallHandler {
        fn execute_call(&self, call: ContractCall) -> Result<CallResult, ExecutionError>;
    }

Refactoring Principles

  • 📏 Single Responsibility: Each function should do one thing well
  • 🧪 Testability: Smaller functions are easier to unit test
  • 📖 Readability: Clear function names describe intent
  • 🔄 Reusability: Extracted methods can be reused in other contexts
  • 🐛 Debugging: Easier to isolate and fix issues

Benefits of Refactoring

  • ✅ Improved code readability and maintainability
  • ✅ Better unit test coverage for individual operations
  • ✅ Easier debugging and error isolation
  • ✅ Reduced cognitive complexity
  • ✅ Better separation of concerns

Definition of Done

  • All functions are <50 lines (target) or <80 lines (maximum)
  • Each function has a single, clear responsibility
  • Extracted methods have comprehensive unit tests
  • Function names clearly describe their purpose
  • No functional changes to external APIs
  • All existing tests continue to pass
  • Code coverage improved for smaller methods

Implementation Strategy

  1. Identify large functions and their responsibilities
  2. Extract logical chunks into private methods
  3. Test each extracted method individually
  4. Refactor original function to use extracted methods
  5. Verify all tests pass and functionality preserved

Priority: ⚡ Medium

Improves code quality and maintainability without blocking critical features.

Estimated Effort: 4-5 days

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestrustPull requests that update rust code

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions