Replies: 2 comments
-
Agree it would be beneficial to leave to the user to decide libc target, I've also run into cases where I need the glibc version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It appears that the issue with static linking glibc is the Rust standard lib, mentioned here. These are the warnings I come up against when static linking with glibc, though it appears that none of these functions are actually used.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It would be nice to support other libc implementations in our standard lib.
It would also be nice to have a nostd version (Maybe by excluding the string functions)
This is a placeholder to discuss possible strategies regarding the standard lib
See #924
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions