Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi @prith-gs , Yes, you can use the Note that this is based on the work of Simley et al. (2020) rather than Rott et al. (2018), but I understand the approaches to be similar (Simley et al. refers to Rott et al. throughout). If you run that example, you'll see a comparison between yaw angles optimized with and without uncertainty. You can of course try different values to of Running in that configuration, the differences in optimal yaw angles are fairly clear: Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Misha, Thanks for the quick response. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I came across this paper by Andreas Rott on Robust active Wake control (https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/3/869/2018/wes-3-869-2018.pdf).
This paper presents a method for optimizing yaw control in wind farms by accounting for wind direction variability and measurement uncertainties. Using an older version of FLORIS, the study investigates how dynamic wind direction changes impact active wake deflection.
I was wondering if this can be run using the current version of FLORIS (v4.2.2) by combining the Yaw Optimization package and the FLORIS Uncertainity model?
I quickly went through the examples, but I wasn't clear if this can be done.
Looking forward to your response.
Best,
Pritheesh
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions