|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Authorization |
| 3 | +id: version-2.0.0-beta.4-authorization |
| 4 | +original_id: authorization |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Authorization is a core feature used in almost all APIs. Sometimes we want to restrict data access or actions for a specific group of users. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +In express.js (and other Node.js frameworks) we use middleware for this, like `passport.js` or the custom ones. However, in GraphQL's resolver architecture we don't have middleware so we have to imperatively call the auth checking function and manually pass context data to each resolver, which might be a bit tedious. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +That's why authorization is a first-class feature in `TypeGraphQL`! |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## How to use |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +First, we need to use the `@Authorized` decorator as a guard on a field, query or mutation. |
| 16 | +Example object type field guards: |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +```ts |
| 19 | +@ObjectType() |
| 20 | +class MyObject { |
| 21 | + @Field() |
| 22 | + publicField: string; |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + @Authorized() |
| 25 | + @Field() |
| 26 | + authorizedField: string; |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + @Authorized("ADMIN") |
| 29 | + @Field() |
| 30 | + adminField: string; |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + @Authorized(["ADMIN", "MODERATOR"]) |
| 33 | + @Field({ nullable: true }) |
| 34 | + hiddenField?: string; |
| 35 | +} |
| 36 | +``` |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +We can leave the `@Authorized` decorator brackets empty or we can specify the role/roles that the user needs to possess in order to get access to the field, query or mutation. |
| 39 | +By default the roles are of type `string` but they can easily be changed as the decorator is generic - `@Authorized<number>(1, 7, 22)`. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +Thus, authorized users (regardless of their roles) can only read the `publicField` or the `authorizedField` from the `MyObject` object. They will receive `null` when accessing the `hiddenField` field and will receive an error (that will propagate through the whole query tree looking for a nullable field) for the `adminField` when they don't satisfy the role constraints. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +Sample query and mutation guards: |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +```ts |
| 46 | +@Resolver() |
| 47 | +class MyResolver { |
| 48 | + @Query() |
| 49 | + publicQuery(): MyObject { |
| 50 | + return { |
| 51 | + publicField: "Some public data", |
| 52 | + authorizedField: "Data for logged users only", |
| 53 | + adminField: "Top secret info for admin", |
| 54 | + }; |
| 55 | + } |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | + @Authorized() |
| 58 | + @Query() |
| 59 | + authedQuery(): string { |
| 60 | + return "Authorized users only!"; |
| 61 | + } |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + @Authorized("ADMIN", "MODERATOR") |
| 64 | + @Mutation() |
| 65 | + adminMutation(): string { |
| 66 | + return "You are an admin/moderator, you can safely drop the database ;)"; |
| 67 | + } |
| 68 | +} |
| 69 | +``` |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Authorized users (regardless of their roles) will be able to read data from the `publicQuery` and the `authedQuery` queries, but will receive an error when trying to perform the `adminMutation` when their roles don't include `ADMIN` or `MODERATOR`. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +Next, we need to create our auth checker function. Its implementation may depend on our business logic: |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +```ts |
| 76 | +export const customAuthChecker: AuthChecker<ContextType> = ( |
| 77 | + { root, args, context, info }, |
| 78 | + roles, |
| 79 | +) => { |
| 80 | + // Read user from context |
| 81 | + // and check the user's permission against the `roles` argument |
| 82 | + // that comes from the '@Authorized' decorator, eg. ["ADMIN", "MODERATOR"] |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | + return true; // or 'false' if access is denied |
| 85 | +}; |
| 86 | +``` |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +The second argument of the `AuthChecker` generic type is `RoleType` - used together with the `@Authorized` decorator generic type. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +Auth checker can be also defined as a class - this way we can leverage the dependency injection mechanism: |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +```ts |
| 93 | +export class CustomAuthChecker implements AuthCheckerInterface<ContextType> { |
| 94 | + constructor( |
| 95 | + // Dependency injection |
| 96 | + private readonly userRepository: Repository<User>, |
| 97 | + ) {} |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + check({ root, args, context, info }: ResolverData<ContextType>, roles: string[]) { |
| 100 | + const userId = getUserIdFromToken(context.token); |
| 101 | + // Use injected service |
| 102 | + const user = this.userRepository.getById(userId); |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + // Custom logic, e.g.: |
| 105 | + return user % 2 === 0; |
| 106 | + } |
| 107 | +} |
| 108 | +``` |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +The last step is to register the function or class while building the schema: |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +```ts |
| 113 | +import { customAuthChecker } from "../auth/custom-auth-checker.ts"; |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +const schema = await buildSchema({ |
| 116 | + resolvers: [MyResolver], |
| 117 | + // Register the auth checking function |
| 118 | + // or defining it inline |
| 119 | + authChecker: customAuthChecker, |
| 120 | +}); |
| 121 | +``` |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +And it's done! 😉 |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +If we need silent auth guards and don't want to return authorization errors to users, we can set the `authMode` property of the `buildSchema` config object to `"null"`: |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +```ts |
| 128 | +const schema = await buildSchema({ |
| 129 | + resolvers: ["./**/*.resolver.ts"], |
| 130 | + authChecker: customAuthChecker, |
| 131 | + authMode: "null", |
| 132 | +}); |
| 133 | +``` |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +It will then return `null` instead of throwing an authorization error. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +## Recipes |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +We can also use `TypeGraphQL` with JWT authentication. |
| 140 | +Here's an example using `@apollo/server`: |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +```ts |
| 143 | +import { ApolloServer } from "@apollo/server"; |
| 144 | +import { expressMiddleware } from "@apollo/server/express4"; |
| 145 | +import express from "express"; |
| 146 | +import jwt from "express-jwt"; |
| 147 | +import bodyParser from "body-parser"; |
| 148 | +import { schema } from "./graphql/schema"; |
| 149 | +import { User } from "./User.type"; |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +// GraphQL path |
| 152 | +const GRAPHQL_PATH = "/graphql"; |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +// GraphQL context |
| 155 | +type Context = { |
| 156 | + user?: User; |
| 157 | +}; |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +// Express |
| 160 | +const app = express(); |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +// Apollo server |
| 163 | +const server = new ApolloServer<Context>({ schema }); |
| 164 | +await server.start(); |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +// Mount a JWT or other authentication middleware that is run before the GraphQL execution |
| 167 | +app.use( |
| 168 | + GRAPHQL_PATH, |
| 169 | + jwt({ |
| 170 | + secret: "TypeGraphQL", |
| 171 | + credentialsRequired: false, |
| 172 | + }), |
| 173 | +); |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +// Apply GraphQL server middleware |
| 176 | +app.use( |
| 177 | + GRAPHQL_PATH, |
| 178 | + bodyParser.json(), |
| 179 | + expressMiddleware(server, { |
| 180 | + // Build context |
| 181 | + // 'req.user' comes from 'express-jwt' |
| 182 | + context: async ({ req }) => ({ user: req.user }), |
| 183 | + }), |
| 184 | +); |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +// Start server |
| 187 | +await new Promise<void>(resolve => app.listen({ port: 4000 }, resolve)); |
| 188 | +console.log(`GraphQL server ready at http://localhost:4000/${GRAPHQL_PATH}`); |
| 189 | +``` |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +Then we can use standard, token based authorization in the HTTP header like in classic REST APIs and take advantage of the `TypeGraphQL` authorization mechanism. |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +## Example |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +See how this works in the [simple real life example](https://github.com/MichalLytek/type-graphql/tree/v2.0.0-beta.4/examples/authorization). |
0 commit comments