Doubt Regarding Project 7 #5012
Unanswered
nilay-v3rma
asked this question in
GSoC Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi @nilay-v3rma, You can include any of these extra projects if you think there's a chance you'll have time to tackle them for the project size you choose. Overall I think it's reasonable to expect at least one extra if you go for a medium size. But you're right in thinking that the automated optimal residue placement comes first, those other "side-quests" are optional. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
The project description mentions "Depending on the size of the project, additional visualizations could be added, such as: a "heatmap" of ligand atoms involved in different interactions by highlighting such atoms with a bivariate Gaussian distribution based on an atomic interaction-aware weighting (see doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-5-43 for reference). Another one could be to generate a figure similar to the LigNetwork with InteractionDrawer, converting the ProLIF metadata to follow their JSON schema. For protein-protein systems and residue network analysis, Flareplot would be very beneficial."
I wanted to confirm If I should Include a detailed plan about these (all or at least some of them) as well in my proposal? I plan to focus first on achieving the core objective of automated, non-overlapping residue placement.
Looking forward to any advice!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions