Replies: 1 comment
-
Totally agree with this comment. I used the following steps to get this working in Portainer.
All of step 2 could be removed if the app created its own default config. This config uses a named volume (dashy_data - which is already created/existing in Portainer) Docker documentation: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Biggest problem I have had with Dashy was getting it started on Docker as I did not realise I had to create the .conf file with contents to get it to boot.
I feel this could be imrpoved by deploying a default file, personally I would go a few better and remove the file mapping and replace it with 1x folder please "/path/Dashy : /config" or something like that and on first run auto deploy a blank conf file so said folder as well as creating 2 more subfolders (Images + Logs),
This way it's easy for people to work out where to add images locally for a start and also easier to get up and running.
Finally as an added bonus we would have easy access and management of logs.
Oh also and I am not sure if this is just me but in Portainer you can't seem to map a file, only folders, you try to map a file and it creates a folder of that name dot included instead so it would by-pass that little problem too.
Either way thanks for the great work so far!!!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions