"standard" extra is confusing and brings contradictory dependencies

[deronnax]

While adding "standard" extra for uvicorn for our production deployment, as the documentation seemed to say it was the right thing to do (it brings the optimized versions of some deps), we noticed with surprize that also it brought colorama and watchfiles, which are unwelcome in a production container.
I think the "standard" extra should be split in two: one for optimized deps for production, and one bringing the extra development features, bringing watchfiles and colorama.
And also, the "standard" name is not really telling, you can't guess what's the purpose by the name. And that's probably not an accident since it seems to have the purppose of "just more stuffs".
What do you think?
I can do the PR if you want.

[Kludex]

I agree we need better naming there.

In your case, I don't think colorama is installed tho - it's only installed on Windows machines. You're right about watchfiles.

---

For reference, this is what happened historically: #219