Does _StreamingResponse correctly inherit Response #2731
Unanswered
whymatter
asked this question in
Potential Issue
Replies: 2 comments
-
You're right that something is wrong with our response inheritance chain. I think we should just re-design it, before 1.0. @abersheeran has thought about this before and has a proposed solution. I would be keep to accept a PR with the fix, ideally one that does the right thing but still tries to minimize breaking changes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
If you're interested, I have a code here that I think is a good inheritance of Response class. https://github.com/abersheeran/baize/blob/master/baize/asgi/responses.py |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I came across this discussion since we were affected by this change. While I understand that we can not expect a
StreamingResponse
I have another issue.Disclaimer: Since I am not a 100% Python typing expert please correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that a derived class should have all attributed that the base class publishes.
The
_StreamingResponse
inheritsResponse
but does not call the super constructur, hence_StreamingResponse
does not have the attributes thatResponse
promises (e.g.body
). Imho there are three possible solutions:_body
. This hides it from external use (I dont think that is the way to go)body
to_StreamingResponse
e.g. by callingsuper
body
from Response or extract another base class likeBaseResponse
that does not have bodyBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions