We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From our conversation: This a possibly silly micro-optimization, but it is easy to try switching from Int64 ids to UInt32 or Int32 ids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems to stop working with Int32. I have to investigate
Int32
Sorry, something went wrong.
#177 uses UInt64 as ids and it can be easily resized to UInt32, but i doubt it will introduce a speedup
No branches or pull requests
From our conversation: This a possibly silly micro-optimization, but it is easy to try switching from Int64 ids to UInt32 or Int32 ids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: