Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Not yet, no. There are still several KA.jl-related regressions we need to look into. Why do you require GPUArrays v11? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
The problem is really finding time to look into the regressions. I currently have some other obligations, and @vchuravy doesn't appear to have time either. I hope this to be resolved in a couple of weeks (early in the new year, realistically), but if you need this merged feel free to help out with the optimization work: JuliaGPU/GPUArrays.jl#565 (there's several PRs on KA.jl too) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Tim, would it be possible to release v5.5.3 to have a tagged version that has compatibility with GPUArrays v11?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions