We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Yes, the previous version in which this bug was not present was: 16.x.x
A date mask with the following format (YYMMdd) fails: 00M0d0 ngx-mask replaces the M0 and d0 portion of the mask with zeros.
No error, just unexpected behavior.
Angular Version:
17.3.11
Anything else relevant?
I am seeing this bug in versions 17.x.x or greater of ngx-mask
No, it is not.
No, they do not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
🐞 bug report
Is this a regression?
Yes, the previous version in which this bug was not present was: 16.x.x
Description
A clear and concise description of the problem...A date mask with the following format (YYMMdd) fails: 00M0d0
ngx-mask replaces the M0 and d0 portion of the mask with zeros.
🔬 Minimal Reproduction
https://stackblitz.com/...🔥 Exception or Error
🌍 Your Environment
Angular Version:
Anything else relevant?
I am seeing this bug in versions 17.x.x or greater of ngx-mask
No, it is not.
No, they do not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: