Skip to content

generalizes flux #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

generalizes flux #44

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

ogauthe
Copy link
Contributor

@ogauthe ogauthe commented Jun 16, 2025

This PR generalizes flux, to be used on ranges and AbstractArray. It also defines UndefinedFlux and checkflux and add tests.

Fix #28

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.37%. Comparing base (d5cc938) to head (fd8f56a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #44      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.32%   94.37%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines         776      782       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          732      738       +6     
  Misses         44       44              
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

Looks good, thanks!

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit f4ad302 into ITensor:main Jun 16, 2025
17 checks passed
@ogauthe ogauthe deleted the checkflux branch June 16, 2025 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ENHANCEMENT] define a check_symmetry function
2 participants