Skip to content

Expected extension of signature files #7

@terhorstd

Description

@terhorstd

When downloading packages and verifying them with a GPG/PGP key, the additional signature file is required.
Currently a signature is expected to have .sig extension. In many repositories signatures have .asc extension instead. This may need to be configurable. Is there any indicator that could bias the exepected extension?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions