You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been looking at the daily energy consumption numbers for my Niro (AU region) and found them very confusing. The method currently used to calculate the kwh/km is to divide the totalPwrCsp by the cumulativeOdo, but this results in a value around 50% higher than the actual value. Here's and example:
I don't have the exact efficiency value for this but it is probably around 140wh/km.
If we calculate it using the current method we would get: totalPwrCsp/calculativeOdo = 11069/47 = 235.5wh/km
Which is way higher than the real value.
A few ideas I've had/tried:
Maybe regenPwr should be subtracted from totalPwrCsp to get the actual energy used? I've tried this and it gets closer to the expected value, but sometime results in values that are way to low to be real (i.e. less than 120wh/km).
I've tried many combinations of adding and subtracting climatePwrCsp' and 'eDPwrCsp' from totalPwrCsp`, but without any luck.
Maybe charging the car somehow affects the numbers? On the days that I charge the numbers seem to be higher, but the pattern is not very strong.
Anyway I hope someone has some thoughts on what might be going on. Here is my last 30 days of data if anyone wants to have a look:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been looking at the daily energy consumption numbers for my Niro (AU region) and found them very confusing. The method currently used to calculate the kwh/km is to divide the
totalPwrCsp
by thecumulativeOdo
, but this results in a value around 50% higher than the actual value. Here's and example:I don't have the exact efficiency value for this but it is probably around 140wh/km.
If we calculate it using the current method we would get:
totalPwrCsp/calculativeOdo = 11069/47 = 235.5wh/km
Which is way higher than the real value.
A few ideas I've had/tried:
regenPwr
should be subtracted fromtotalPwrCsp
to get the actual energy used? I've tried this and it gets closer to the expected value, but sometime results in values that are way to low to be real (i.e. less than 120wh/km).climatePwrCsp' and 'eDPwrCsp' from
totalPwrCsp`, but without any luck.Anyway I hope someone has some thoughts on what might be going on. Here is my last 30 days of data if anyone wants to have a look:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions