Skip to content

Great job, questions about the results #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
yanghu819 opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Great job, questions about the results #4

yanghu819 opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@yanghu819
Copy link

I run

python train.py --digit --fix_src --dataset gsm8k --steps 120000 --weights_path /huyang/r1/diffusion-of-thoughts/plaid1b_weights/

python evaluation_batch.py --weights_path outputs/gsm8k-bs16-fix_src-digit-steps120000 --fix_src --digit --dataset gsm8k --score_temp 0.5

the result is
[2025-02-24 13:14:58,570] total: 1319, corr: 68, acc: 0.05155420773313116
[2025-02-24 13:14:58,570] time: 315.3894371986389s
[2025-02-24 13:14:58,571] Mean: 0.05155420773313116, Std: 0.0

Am I doing right? Thank you so much for checking the issue

@yanghu819
Copy link
Author

I find acc: 0.05 is due to my imcomplete training data, after using the right gsm8k, the result is a lot better, but still have some issues.

Image

Image

the train and eval code are as:
python train.py --digit --fix_src --dataset gsm8k --steps 120000 --weights_path /huyang/r1/diffusion-of-thoughts/plaid1b_weights/

python evaluation_batch.py --weights_path outputs/gsm8k-bs16-fix_src-digit-steps120000 --fix_src --digit --dataset gsm8k --score_temp 0.5

the final result is acc: 0.19863532979529946.
It can't achieve the paper result 32.6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant