Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @Mydurian, ParquetSharp doesn't depend on the names of schema nodes matching the specification, following the backward-compatibility rules, but we currently only support lists that are represented with the three level structure and don't handle data that is missing the inner element layer. I don't think there's a simple way to work around this, but we'd be open to accepting a pull request to add backwards-compatibility support for reading files that don't use the standard schema structure. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Team,

When referring the Apache official doc for complex logical type.. I see that the structure definition is somewhere different. Could you help elaborate a little bit more on how to handle some backward-compatibility in ParquetSharp? Thanks in advance.
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions