Repo is missing license

[virtualzx1]

The repo is missing a license, which makes it technically a closed sourced, even though I believe it is intended to be open source. I suggest adding an MIT license

[FranxYao]

Hi,

Thank you for the suggestion. I would love to. Yet the data generated from code-davinci-002 cannot be MIT I guess? How can I address that?

Thanks!

[virtualzx1]

Maybe i wasn't paying enough attention, but i thought this repo only contains the code to process the results and the original prompt? These can certainly be MIT licensed. The license would not apply to the return of the model, which i did not think was part of the repo, but on the google drive. or did i not get that fully right?

in any case the source code part and original seed prompts are definitely suitable for MIT license. i guess you just need to be careful that the output part are all on the drive and not accidentally checked in.