|
18 | 18 |
|
19 | 19 | ## Abstract |
20 | 20 |
|
21 | | -Ternary Logic (TL) is a novel evidentiary framework designed to address the inherent limitations of bivalent logic in complex economic and financial systems. Traditional binary systems, which operate on a simple commit/reject basis, lack a native capacity for in-flight verification, leading to operational risk, costly post-facto reconciliation, and a deficit of verifiable trust. TL introduces a third logical state—the **Epistemic Hold**—a mandatory, time-bounded verification window between the proposal of an action and its final commitment. This core innovation, combined with an **Immutable Ledger** for finality and **Decision Logs** for causal transparency, creates a complete evidentiary package for every transaction. The framework is articulated through eight foundational pillars, including the **Goukassian Principle** for systemic oversight and the **Hybrid Shield** for balancing privacy with public verifiability. Enforced by non-negotiable mandates such as **No Log = No Action**, TL provides a robust architectural foundation for critical infrastructure. Governed by a hybrid model of a **Technical Council, Stewardship Custodians**, and a **Smart Contract Treasury**, TL is engineered to support the development of resilient, transparent, and accountable systems for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), capital markets, supply chains, and sustainable finance. |
| 21 | +Ternary Logic (TL) is a novel evidentiary framework designed to address the inherent limitations of bivalent logic in complex economic and financial systems. Traditional binary systems, which operate on a simple commit/reject basis, lack a native capacity for in-flight verification, leading to operational risk, costly post-facto reconciliation, and a deficit of verifiable trust. TL introduces a third logical state—the **Epistemic Hold**, a mandatory, time-bounded verification window between the proposal of an action and its final commitment. This core innovation, combined with an **Immutable Ledger** for finality and **Decision Logs** for causal transparency, creates a complete evidentiary package for every transaction. The framework is articulated through eight foundational pillars, including the **Goukassian Principle** for systemic oversight and the **Hybrid Shield** for balancing privacy with public verifiability. Enforced by non-negotiable mandates such as **No Log = No Action**, TL provides a robust architectural foundation for critical infrastructure. Governed by a hybrid model of a **Technical Council, Stewardship Custodians**, and a **Smart Contract Treasury**, TL is engineered to support the development of resilient, transparent, and accountable systems for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), capital markets, supply chains, and sustainable finance. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +--- |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +## Ternary Logic's Purpose: Evidentiary Trust and Verifiable States |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Ternary Logic (TL) is proposed as a direct solution to the shortcomings of bivalent systems. Its purpose is to establish evidentiary trust by re-architecting the transaction lifecycle around a third logical state: the Held state, or Epistemic Hold. This state is not merely a technical feature but a fundamental paradigm shift. It introduces a mandatory, observable, and time-bounded window for verification that is a native part of the transaction protocol itself. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +The core objective of TL is to ensure that every committed action is not only final but also demonstrably valid. It achieves this by enforcing the mandate No Log = No Action, ensuring that every proposed state change is preceded by the creation of an immutable log. This log, along with the subsequent verification process within the Epistemic Hold, generates a complete, self-contained evidentiary package for each transaction. This package provides a non-repudiable answer to not only "what" happened, but also "why" it happened and "how" it was verified. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +By internalizing the verification step, TL transforms the nature of trust in digital systems. Instead of trusting system operators or relying on post-facto auditors to reconstruct events, participants can place their trust in a verifiable process. This evidentiary trust is the foundation upon which more resilient, transparent, and accountable economic systems can be built, from national payment infrastructures to global supply chains. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Attribute Bivalent System (e.g., Traditional Database, Standard Blockchain) Ternary Logic System |
| 34 | +Core States Commit / Reject (True / False) Pending -> Held -> Committed / Aborted |
| 35 | +Verification Pre-processing or post-facto; external to core transaction logic. Intrinsic; mandatory Epistemic Hold for in-flight verification. |
| 36 | +Audit Trail Primarily post-facto analysis of committed states. Real-time observability of process; Decision Logs capture causality. |
| 37 | +Error Handling Requires new, reversing transactions; complex and costly reconciliation. Pre-emptive abortion from Held state; prevents erroneous commitment. |
| 38 | +Finality Immediate but potentially erroneous commitment. Deliberate, verifiable finality after checks are passed. |
| 39 | +Trust Model Trust in system operators and post-facto auditors. Evidentiary trust in a verifiable, pre-audited process. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +**Table 1: The Hybrid Shield \- A Multi-Layered Protection Matrix for the Goukassian Principle** |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +| Threat Vector | Cryptographic Layer | Legal Layer | Governance Layer | |
| 44 | +| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- | |
| 45 | +| **Political Co-option** | Public, permissionless audit trail of all actions prevents secret directives or overrides. | "No Spy" clause in the license creates legal friction against use for state surveillance. | DAO veto power over protocol changes prevents weakening of safeguards under political pressure. | |
| 46 | +| **Malicious Technical Forking** | Embedded, non-removable "Signature" ensures provenance, preventing anonymous rebranding of a compromised version. | License terms apply to all derivative works, making a stripped-down fork a clear license violation. | Foundation controls official branding and certification, marginalizing non-compliant forks. | |
| 47 | +| **Legal Circumvention** | Smart contract-based auto-revocation of certification provides immediate, non-litigious consequences for violations. | Explicit prohibitions ("No Weapon") create clear grounds for legal challenges and injunctions. | Governance body can publicly decertify and sanction entities attempting to exploit legal loopholes. | |
| 48 | +| **Institutional Capture** | Decentralized nature of the verification anchor (public blockchain) prevents a single entity from controlling the historical record. | Licensing framework is universal and cannot be selectively waived for powerful actors. | Distributed voting rights (e.g., quadratic voting) in the DAO prevent a single custodian from seizing control. | |
22 | 49 |
|
23 | 50 | --- |
24 | 51 |
|
@@ -57,6 +84,10 @@ Through this orchestration, TL transforms every action from a single decision in |
57 | 84 |
|
58 | 85 | #### *In binary systems, a transaction ends with execution. In Ternary Logic, it ends with understanding.* |
59 | 86 |
|
| 87 | +--- |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + |
60 | 91 | --- |
61 | 92 |
|
62 | 93 | ### Implementation Architecture |
|
0 commit comments