Replies: 1 comment
-
I think the larger the chunk size the better the performance
Try removing the above or set it to much higher number e.g. Are the files share-able? If yes I can take a look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am fairly new at handling medium sized data so I could very well be doing something basic wrong, but I am not seeing what my issue could be.
I have a 9 GB csv file, and am running on an 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1185G7 @ 3.00 Ghz with 4 cores, 8 logical processors, and 15.7 GB of Memory. I am using R 3.6.1 (can't update due to employer). 120M rows and 19 columns.
When I run the fallowing code the stage1splitter runs for hours with no results. and the cpu usage for the R for Windows front-end workers is 0% most of the time.
Code
Output
Is this an issue with using 3.6.1? When I load disk.frame I get
Warning message: package ‘disk.frame’ was built under R version 3.6.3
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions